May 28, 2018
Last time i promoted my stuff here there were two compiler/Phobos bugs preventing to activate this nice getopt-like function.

specs:

- It's based on UDA.
- It supports multiple locations for UDA-fied functions and variables.
- It doesn't use pointers, UDA-ified variable are accessed without intermediary.
- It's faster than the phobos one (although getopt is never a bottleneck)
- It's `@safe` and can be even `nothrow`

It could be easily added to phobos (just need to convert some EnumSet to BitFlag).

- code: https://github.com/BBasile/iz/blob/master/import/iz/options.d#L596
- DUB: https://code.dlang.org/packages/iz
- doc: https://iz.dpldocs.info/v0.6.18/iz.options.handleArguments.html
- cool demo: https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/blob/master/dastworx/src/main.d#L18

Note that despite of the run-time compatibility mention in the README, this module is part of a subset of IZ that can be used without all the concept of Nogc as used in iz. (at some point i should split the twos parts).
November 16

On Monday, 28 May 2018 at 00:53:45 UTC, Basile B. wrote:

>

Last time i promoted my stuff here there were two compiler/Phobos bugs preventing to activate this nice getopt-like function.

specs:

  • It's based on UDA.
  • It supports multiple locations for UDA-fied functions and variables.
  • It doesn't use pointers, UDA-ified variable are accessed without intermediary.
  • It's faster than the phobos one (although getopt is never a bottleneck)
  • It's @safe and can be even nothrow

It could be easily added to phobos (just need to convert some EnumSet to BitFlag).

Note that despite of the run-time compatibility mention in the README, this module is part of a subset of IZ that can be used without all the concept of Nogc as used in iz. (at some point i should split the twos parts).

such attribute-based getopt is now used in styx driver e.g

In styx now I just do

if !getOpt![(session, DriverOptions, MachineTarget)](processCeeArgs(argc, argv), &onArgument) do
        return 1;

At some point we forgot what we wanted to do in D ;)